mattcoughlin Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 I recently upgraded my cache drive to a Samsung 960 evo NVME drive to take advantage of the 10 gigabit connection to my server. Oddly enough I cannot saturate the connection with a drive that is capable of writing at around 2 GB/s. I am only getting 400-500 MB/s on write to the server, but if I read that file back to my windows PC i get the full network speed (1.07 GB/s). Anyone know how i can boost this speed? Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 These may help if not already in use: 1-Change NIC mtu do 9000 (unRAID server and any other computer with a 10GbE NIC) 2-Go to Settings -> Global Share Settings -> Tunable (enable direct IO): set to Yes Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted September 30, 2017 Author Share Posted September 30, 2017 (edited) the global share setting were on auto not yes. changing this has helped (up to 600-800 consistant), but i'm still not as fast as the read transfer speeds off the drive. how to i change the NIC mtu? Edited September 30, 2017 by mattcoughlin Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 Settings -> Network Settings Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted September 30, 2017 Author Share Posted September 30, 2017 So changed them both, but when i change the MTU from the stock 1500 on my windows PC it is no longer able to communicate with the server. It knows that it's online (all the mapped network drives show up) but i can't open the gui or any folders. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 Are you using a 10GbE switch or direct connect? If using a switch you need to change the MTU there also. Quote Link to comment
FreeMan Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 I'm just curious what you do on your network that you need 10GbE? Of course, I'm assuming (with all inherent dangers) that this is a home server, but I can't fathom why you'd need that speed internally at home. Not a criticism, just trying to learn. Quote Link to comment
RonUSMC Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 30 minutes ago, FreeMan said: I'm just curious what you do on your network that you need 10GbE? Of course, I'm assuming (with all inherent dangers) that this is a home server, but I can't fathom why you'd need that speed internally at home. Not a criticism, just trying to learn. I recently upgraded my server and a single system with a dac to 10gbe. I love the new speed. 10gbe for like $70, can't beat it. I do lots of file transfers back and forth. I watch movies and do lots of work directly from the array/shared folders. If I can do something that will save me 10 seconds, I will do that. You would really be surprised at how much it begins to add up. I work in User Experience and when I worked at Microsoft we did several studies around efficiency and productivity. There were very simple things you could do that would increase your efficiency greatly. The most stark results were from using dual monitors, but also things like sitting/arms/desk height, size of the keyboard/mouse, disk speed (mainly access speed), network speed. Tuning these very small details will change your experience and help you to accomplish more. I think the most interesting thing about the studies we did were around people's attitudes before and after. Subtle changes to their environment created a more positive attitude, they "felt" like they were doing more, but couldn't explain why. Quote Link to comment
FreeMan Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 1 hour ago, RonUSMC said: I work in User Experience and when I worked at Microsoft If I find you you had anything to do with the "touchscreen interface for 24-inch desktop monitor" decision, I'll reach right through this monitor and strangle you!!! Ugh... not my favorite decision... On a serious note, thanks for the feedback, that's very interesting. I can't agree more on the monitor side - I'm looking at 1 of my 4 on this machine right now. Once I've upgraded my disk controller and taken care of some car upgrades and other items, I may give 10gig networking a thought. Quote Link to comment
RonUSMC Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 Just now, FreeMan said: If I find you you had anything to do with the "touchscreen interface for 24-inch desktop monitor" decision, I'll reach right through this monitor and strangle you!!! Ugh... not my favorite decision... On a serious note, thanks for the feedback, that's very interesting. I can't agree more on the monitor side - I'm looking at 1 of my 4 on this machine right now. Once I've upgraded my disk controller and taken care of some car upgrades and other items, I may give 10gig networking a thought. I actually worked on the Surface platform for over a year helping push the touchscreens at Microsoft. http://www.google.com.pg/patents/US20100241955 I didn't really get into the ordeal when they were porting all of our hard work directly into the touchscreen laptops, but I am very opinionated and wouldn't have allowed many of the things they produced in the years after I left. I think there were some seriously lazy decisions made about those interactions and a complete lack of regard for environment size. I like to think it would have been better if I was there during that time. I did end up going back and helping with the release of Microsoft Surface Studio, but left immediately after. 1 Quote Link to comment
FreeMan Posted September 30, 2017 Share Posted September 30, 2017 (edited) Sounds like good times. Based on your user name, I'm glad I don't have to attempt to carry through with my "threat", though! (and thanks for serving!) /threadjack Edited September 30, 2017 by FreeMan Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted October 1, 2017 Author Share Posted October 1, 2017 (edited) To answer FreeMan's question, it is a home network. I have a 48 port switch in my media cabinet because I have hardwired almost everything in my house and i also have POE security cameras that run to it. It had built in SFP+ ports on it so I decided to put them to use. I had the transfer speeds working properly (1.15 GB/s), but now its back down to 700MB/s and my plex and plexpy dockers won't start. Here is the log file from Plex. It will then just repeat starting plex. Error.txt Edited October 1, 2017 by mattcoughlin Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted October 2, 2017 Author Share Posted October 2, 2017 Still having problems... Can anyone help? Quote Link to comment
1812 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Post - Tools>diagnostics after trying to start plex/etc Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted October 2, 2017 Author Share Posted October 2, 2017 unraid-diagnostics-20171002-0605.zip Quote Link to comment
1812 Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 might be an issue, i don' use this 10gbe card, but it says you are getting a 20% loss, though should be way more available bandwidth....: ixgbe: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit PCI Express Network Driver - version 4.4.0-k Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: ixgbe: Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Intel Corporation. Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: Multiqueue Enabled: Rx Queue count = 12, Tx Queue count = 12 Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: PCI Express bandwidth of 32GT/s available Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: (Speed:5.0GT/s, Width: x8, Encoding Loss:20%) Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: MAC: 2, PHY: 17, SFP+: 5, PBA No: G30771-004 Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: 90:e2:ba:47:d8:26 Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: Intel(R) 10 Gigabit Network Connection Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: e1000e: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - 3.2.6-k Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: e1000e: Copyright(c) 1999 - 2015 Intel Corporation. Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: e1000e 0000:00:19.0: Interrupt Throttling Rate (ints/sec) set to dynamic conservative mode your docker problem is most likely related to your call trace errors Quote ------------[ cut here ]------------ Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 21906 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:134 btrfs_put_block_group+0x42/0x59 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: Modules linked in: md_mod xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 ebtable_filter ebtables xt_nat veth ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables nf_nat e1000e ixgbe ptp pps_core mdio mxm_wmi x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp i2c_i801 i2c_smbus i2c_core ahci nvme libahci nvme_core wmi [last unloaded: md_mod] Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: CPU: 3 PID: 21906 Comm: umount Not tainted 4.9.30-unRAID #1 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: Hardware name: MSI MS-7885/X99A RAIDER (MS-7885), BIOS P.50 07/19/2016 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ffffc90002ea3d20 ffffffff813a4a1b 0000000000000000 ffffffff819692b0 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ffffc90002ea3d60 ffffffff8104d0d9 0000008602ea3d00 ffff880453348c00 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ffff880453348ce8 ffff88044c34c090 ffff880453348c00 ffff88044c34c0a0 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: Call Trace: Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff813a4a1b>] dump_stack+0x61/0x7e Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8104d0d9>] __warn+0xb8/0xd3 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1a1>] warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x1a Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812d6c15>] btrfs_put_block_group+0x42/0x59 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812dcf26>] btrfs_free_block_groups+0x19d/0x39b Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812ec0f4>] close_ctree+0x1d4/0x2e8 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81137ff1>] ? evict_inodes+0x128/0x137 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812c6f4b>] btrfs_put_super+0x14/0x16 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff811232fb>] generic_shutdown_super+0x6a/0xeb Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8112355e>] kill_anon_super+0xd/0x17 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812c6e92>] btrfs_kill_super+0x11/0x94 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81123750>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x68 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff811240ec>] deactivate_super+0x39/0x3c Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8113b02e>] cleanup_mnt+0x53/0x71 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8113b080>] __cleanup_mnt+0xd/0xf Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81062609>] task_work_run+0x6a/0x7d Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81002b24>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x55/0x81 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81002c61>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x44/0x47 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8167f5c4>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xa7/0xa9 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ---[ end trace 196aa00775cb4f80 ]--- Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 21906 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:10045 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x37a/0x39b Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: Modules linked in: md_mod xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 ebtable_filter ebtables xt_nat veth ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables nf_nat e1000e ixgbe ptp pps_core mdio mxm_wmi x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp i2c_i801 i2c_smbus i2c_core ahci nvme libahci nvme_core wmi [last unloaded: md_mod] Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: CPU: 3 PID: 21906 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.9.30-unRAID #1 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: Hardware name: MSI MS-7885/X99A RAIDER (MS-7885), BIOS P.50 07/19/2016 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ffffc90002ea3d38 ffffffff813a4a1b 0000000000000000 ffffffff819692b0 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ffffc90002ea3d78 ffffffff8104d0d9 0000273d02ea3d40 ffff88044c34c000 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ffff880453348888 ffff880453348800 ffff88044c34cb30 0000000000000000 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: Call Trace: Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff813a4a1b>] dump_stack+0x61/0x7e Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8104d0d9>] __warn+0xb8/0xd3 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1a1>] warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x1a Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812dd103>] btrfs_free_block_groups+0x37a/0x39b Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812ec0f4>] close_ctree+0x1d4/0x2e8 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81137ff1>] ? evict_inodes+0x128/0x137 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812c6f4b>] btrfs_put_super+0x14/0x16 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff811232fb>] generic_shutdown_super+0x6a/0xeb Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8112355e>] kill_anon_super+0xd/0x17 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff812c6e92>] btrfs_kill_super+0x11/0x94 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81123750>] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x68 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff811240ec>] deactivate_super+0x39/0x3c Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8113b02e>] cleanup_mnt+0x53/0x71 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8113b080>] __cleanup_mnt+0xd/0xf Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81062609>] task_work_run+0x6a/0x7d Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81002b24>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x55/0x81 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff81002c61>] syscall_return_slowpath+0x44/0x47 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: [<ffffffff8167f5c4>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xa7/0xa9 Sep 30 23:51:22 Unraid kernel: ---[ end trace 196aa00775cb4f81 ]--- and some other fun disk errors Oct 1 00:00:12 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x280100 action 0x6 frozen Oct 1 00:00:12 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: irq_stat 0x08000000, interface fatal error Oct 1 00:00:12 Unraid kernel: ata10: SError: { UnrecovData 10B8B BadCRC } Oct 1 00:00:12 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Oct 1 00:00:12 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: cmd 25/00:40:a8:45:02/00:05:00:00:00/e0 tag 1 dma 688128 in Oct 1 00:00:12 Unraid kernel: res 50/00:00:a8:45:02/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error) Oct 1 00:00:12 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: status: { DRDY } Oct 1 00:00:12 Unraid kernel: ata10: hard resetting link Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT1.SPT5._GTF] (Node ffff8804af1672d0), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT1.SPT5._GTF] (Node ffff8804af1672d0), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: configured for UDMA/133 Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10: EH complete Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x280100 action 0x6 frozen Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: irq_stat 0x08000000, interface fatal error Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10: SError: { UnrecovData 10B8B BadCRC } Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: cmd 25/00:70:b8:54:02/00:04:00:00:00/e0 tag 7 dma 581632 in Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: res 50/00:00:b8:54:02/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: status: { DRDY } Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10: hard resetting link Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT1.SPT5._GTF] (Node ffff8804af1672d0), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT1.SPT5._GTF] (Node ffff8804af1672d0), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: configured for UDMA/133 Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10: EH complete Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x280100 action 0x6 frozen Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: irq_stat 0x08000000, interface fatal error Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10: SError: { UnrecovData 10B8B BadCRC } Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: cmd 25/00:40:f0:f4:02/00:05:00:00:00/e0 tag 11 dma 688128 in Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: res 50/00:00:f0:f4:02/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error) Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: status: { DRDY } Oct 1 00:00:13 Unraid kernel: ata10: hard resetting link Oct 1 00:00:14 Unraid kernel: ata10: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300) Oct 1 00:00:14 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) Oct 1 00:00:14 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT1.SPT5._GTF] (Node ffff8804af1672d0), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Oct 1 00:00:14 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) Oct 1 00:00:14 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT1.SPT5._GTF] (Node ffff8804af1672d0), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Oct 1 00:00:14 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: configured for UDMA/133 Oct 1 00:00:14 Unraid kernel: ata10: EH complete Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10: limiting SATA link speed to 3.0 Gbps Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x280100 action 0x6 frozen Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: irq_stat 0x08000000, interface fatal error Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10: SError: { UnrecovData 10B8B BadCRC } Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: failed command: READ DMA EXT Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: cmd 25/00:40:d0:f8:04/00:05:00:00:00/e0 tag 21 dma 688128 in Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: res 50/00:00:d0:f8:04/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x10 (ATA bus error) Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: status: { DRDY } Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10: hard resetting link Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 320) Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT1.SPT5._GTF] (Node ffff8804af1672d0), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT1.SPT5._GTF] (Node ffff8804af1672d0), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Oct 1 00:00:15 Unraid kernel: ata10.00: configured for UDMA/133 Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 5 hours ago, 1812 said: might be an issue, i don' use this 10gbe card, but it says you are getting a 20% loss, though should be way more available bandwidth....: Sep 30 22:07:53 Unraid kernel: ixgbe 0000:03:00.0: (Speed:5.0GT/s, Width: x8, Encoding Loss:20%) This is normal and it affects all PCIe 1.0 and 2.0 links due to 8b/10b encoding, PCIe 3.0 upgrades the encoding to 128b/130b. Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted October 3, 2017 Author Share Posted October 3, 2017 If I read from the drive I get around 1.1 GB/s but writing to the drive I get around half. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 What capacity is your 960 Evo? Only the 1TB can sustain 1GB/s writes. Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted October 3, 2017 Author Share Posted October 3, 2017 (edited) It is the 1tb. And I have had it writing as high as 1.14 GB/s but I'll come back the next day and it's only like 600 or 700. Also how do I fix my dockers? Someone suggested a call trace error but I'm not sure how to fix it. Edited October 3, 2017 by mattcoughlin Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Deleting and recreating the docker image it's usually the best way to fix dockers. Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted October 3, 2017 Author Share Posted October 3, 2017 I tried that already. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Then your best option is to post on the support thread for that docker. Quote Link to comment
mattcoughlin Posted October 5, 2017 Author Share Posted October 5, 2017 Ok. Has anyone ever tried reformatting the unraid USB Boot drive and readding the data drives? I have had a few random issues with things like windows 10 vms not booting or crashplan (when i used to have it) getting into a reboot cycle every 15 minutes. My thought is to just start the drive fresh if i can reassign the drives without loosing data. Quote Link to comment
greg2895 Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 I am having the same issues here. Can't saturate 10gbe at about 350mb/s. Direct I/O is giving me call traces and all docker apps had to be changed from mnt/usr/appdata to mnt/cache/appdata for them to be able to read/write. To top it off i am still only getting 350mb over 10gbe! I am out of ideas. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.