dikkiedirk Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 When I want to use a VPN service as protection against the prying eyes from the authorities when downloading with usenet or torrent clien how should it be set up? Does any computer, server or NAS be configured to use this VPN or should my router be configured to use this VPN and be done with it? Does it influence speed when browsing and downloading? What is the best service for use in the Netherlands/Europe? Quote Link to comment
tdallen Posted September 16, 2017 Share Posted September 16, 2017 If you want all your traffic to go out via VPN and your router supports it, you could simply configure your router with the VPN. As an alternative, you can use Dockers like the ones offered by binhex (deluge, sab, etc) which have built in VPN support. In that case you're being selective about what uses the VPN. Finally you could use something like pfsense for your router, I believe you can get very selective there. In my experience VPN speeds vary but it does tend to slow things down, at least a little and sometimes moderately. Quote Link to comment
uldise Posted September 17, 2017 Share Posted September 17, 2017 what speeds are you expecting? to achieve 100+Mbit/s if you go router path, you need very capable hardware to encrypt/decrypt data. if you choose application path then this power is needed in application - like tdallen mentioned, deluge, sab, etc or virtual router like pfsense. i'm using virtual router from Mikrotik(Cloud host router) for site-to-site vpn and it works very well. Quote Link to comment
carolyn6 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Hmm, what about Raspberry Pi? I think it is a good option for the EU. As far as I know, it is a cost-effective option. Did you consider it? Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Raspberry Pi will severely hinder your speed.There's some articles about pfsense on our website that you may find useful. Quote Link to comment
unevent Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, CHBMB said: Raspberry Pi will severely hinder your speed. There's some articles about pfsense on our website that you may find useful. Raspberry Pi has dedicated hardware for crypto and can perform quite well depending on the throughput needed. Which Pi you use and the software plays a big role. Edited September 22, 2017 by unevent Quote Link to comment
HellDiverUK Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 The Pi only has a 100Mb NIC, which sort of slows stuff down. I run OpenVPN on my router (top of the range TPLink), but it's pretty slow - the router's CPU is a bit crap. It ran much better on my old Asus RT-AC87U. Shame the Asus freaked out and corrupted it's 5GHz firmware. I used to run the VPN on a cheap TPLink pocket router, which I installed OpenWRT on to. It seemed to run the VPN far quicker - the little Broadcom in the pocket router must have had dedicated hardware for the VPN. Quote Link to comment
unevent Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 2 hours ago, HellDiverUK said: The Pi only has a 100Mb NIC, which sort of slows stuff down. I run OpenVPN on my router (top of the range TPLink), but it's pretty slow - the router's CPU is a bit crap. It ran much better on my old Asus RT-AC87U. Shame the Asus freaked out and corrupted it's 5GHz firmware. I used to run the VPN on a cheap TPLink pocket router, which I installed OpenWRT on to. It seemed to run the VPN far quicker - the little Broadcom in the pocket router must have had dedicated hardware for the VPN. If you are saturating a 100Mbit WAN connection 'Captian Obvious' should have kicked in long before in the hardware selection process. For your Asus, they moved to Qualcomm vs Broadcomm for that model and the 5GHz was limp. Look into Merlin firmware for that model, there are some improvements over stock. Quote Link to comment
ijuarez Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 I stick to pfSense, of course i'm biased. Quote Link to comment
unevent Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 1 hour ago, ijuarez said: I stick to pfSense, of course i'm biased. +1 Quote Link to comment
HellDiverUK Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 4 hours ago, unevent said: For your Asus, they moved to Qualcomm vs Broadcomm for that model and the 5GHz was limp. Look into Merlin firmware for that model, there are some improvements over stock. Quantenna, but you were close. I've been running Merlin firmware on my various Asus routers from Merlin started releasing firmwares. The issue is the firmware on the Quantenna gets corrupt and then can't talk to the SOC any more - game over for the 5GHz. Shame, it was a brilliant router until it curled it's toes up and died. Quote Link to comment
unevent Posted September 29, 2017 Share Posted September 29, 2017 48 minutes ago, HellDiverUK said: Quantenna, but you were close. I've been running Merlin firmware on my various Asus routers from Merlin started releasing firmwares. The issue is the firmware on the Quantenna gets corrupt and then can't talk to the SOC any more - game over for the 5GHz. Shame, it was a brilliant router until it curled it's toes up and died. Yep Quantenna, thanks for the clarification. 1 Quote Link to comment
carolyn6 Posted October 9, 2017 Share Posted October 9, 2017 I have checked several articles about Raspberry Pi as a VPN, I think this one describes all its functions the best. As far as I can see, it has three main advantages: First, it requires relatively little power for long-term operation as a server (mentioned in the article). Secondly, it is a safe option and lastly, it is cost-effective. Of course, it depends on the throughput, as it has been mentioned in the previous posts. Anyway, I hope it will help you to choose the right option. If you decide to set up Rasberry Pi, there are setup instructions in the article. Quote Link to comment
unevent Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 (edited) To throw another option out, look at the ASRock J3355B-ITX. It has an embedded Celeron J3355 which is dual core 2.0GHz, w/AES-NI and 10W TDP. In the US it goes for around $55. Edited October 13, 2017 by unevent Quote Link to comment
charleslam Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 pfsense for the win. i use an amd quad-core in mine. low power, at most hits 30 watts. typically at 20 watts. those micro-itx boards work well for this sort of thing. i have mine with a mellanox connectx-2 fiber card in it and added the driver for pfsense to see it. i know mine is overkill but its future proof. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.