Motherboard CPU recomendations


Recommended Posts

I know this has been covered thousands of times, I've read 12 or more threads about this very topic but none fit my situation.

 

Currently I'm running

 - Supermicro - X10SLL-F motherboard

- Intel® Xeon® CPU E3-1220 v3 @ 3.10GHz Processor

- 32GB of ECC Ram

 

My current setup has 5 drives (2 Parity & 3 data) and a single cache drive.

I have 2 VM running, one is a simple website, the other is a VDI (not for gaming general web work)

I have 5 dockers running about 100% of time time.  only one draws much cpu time (plex)

 

Since plex has introduced Live TV my family records about 15 to 20 shows a day, and seems to stream a lot more than usual.  I'm getting transcoading issues due to lack of CPU power.  I've given Plex full control of 3 of the 4 cores and everything else runs on core #1

 

I'd like to upgrade processors for more cores to assist in the overload issues.  I know my current MB is a few gen old so can anyone assist me in parting out new hardware?

 

Thx

Link to comment

Looking up the suggested processors,  thanks for the great suggestions.

 

Is there an advantage to keeping with Xeon processors and not moving to a i5 or i7?

 

As for things that I'd like to get that i currently dont have more on-board sata would be nice, but I have an expansion card if and when i need it.

Edited by m.b.d
Link to comment
On 9/14/2017 at 1:30 PM, HellDiverUK said:

On almost all i5 and i7 you lose ECC support.  There's typically a Xeon E3 part to match every i5 and i7 as far as clock speed and core counts are concerned.

 

There are a few i5 and i7 chips that support ECC, but I've never seen them 'in the wild' as they either never really existed, or were used in specific OEM machines.

I knew i would loose the Ecc support, but with Unraid is ECC worth the expense?

 

I've ordered the replacement 1281v3 its sitting at the post office waiting for Monday :(

Link to comment

I used to argue that ECC was a nice to have not a need to have, and to some degree I still feel that way however it comes down to how important your data is to you. For the extra cost I now feel it's worth it, but that is just my opinion. You get extra protection with ECC in the event that a memory error occurs. Some might say memory errors are rare and they may be right, but again, how important is your data?

Link to comment

If I have a board/CPU that supports ECC, then I'll use it - if I can't I don't sweat it.

 

Anecdote: 6 workstations running 24/7 at work for just under 9 years, and only 1 ECC memory error has happened in all that time, and it was quite recently during a storm where the mains went out and the building switched to generator.  They're Dell Precision T5400 with dual Xeon chips and the super-expensive FBDIMMs.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.