tjb_altf4

Not sure if this has been clarified yet, but similar subscription/support models I've seen elsewhere give free patch level upgrades, e.g. if your support period ends on 6.14.x release, you will get any .x updates included, but you can't go to +6.15.x without renewing. This is what I hope LT will adopt for Unraid, and will actually make certain versioning decisions more important for them in regards to support and revenue.

I'm happy to see this change as it will give Unraid the resources it needs to really shine and iterate new features and all the other things we all want. Also grateful that the licencing model doesn't penalise for time missed, Atlassian used to do this for their self hosted software and I hated it to the nth degree. Now get cracking on the multi array release please

Use unassigned devices plugin to mount the smb or nfs share to unraid (appears under /mnt/remotes). This can then be mounted into the docker using the usual options. Of course most new synologys have the capability to run docker, and you might be better of running deluge directly on the synology to avoid complexity.

Definitely one for the Emby developers over on their forum if you don't like the changes, but you can still see missing episodes, but it has been moved to the 3 dot icon:

Just a heads up, I noticed the default tag set in this template is "master", but Loki moved over to the more PC term "main" 2 years ago. This means the default tag will load a 2 year old version of Loki, which is insecure and will likely have compatibility issues.

https://help.ui.com/hc/en-us/articles/218506997-UniFi-Network-Required-Ports-Reference

Is it possible to modify the disk labels auto created by Unraid for disks on main? I have some new white label WD HC550s, and some are showing with a slightly different model name layout, even though its same model as others. Alternatively, any utilities to modify properties of the disk itself? Just looking to appease my OCD tendencies, this is not breaking anything.

No problem sata adaptor https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09MSWNF7X short sata cables https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B075H5ML4B sata power was a modified one of these https://www.amazon.com/StarTech-com-Power-Splitter-Adapter-PYO4SATA/dp/B0086OGN9E Other pieces were 3d printed, but thick double sided tape would work also I'd imagine

This change seems to have been reverted at some point in 6.12, no way to get cpu graph only anymore.

that is a generic smb problem, this post has some suggestions for improving performance

I looked at doing something similar to what you described earlier in the year, but I ended up taking a much simpler route with a pair of 1.6TB PM1735 pcie add in cards, which hit my size and performance targets, for a reasonable price all things considered. This is the ebay listing I bought them from https://www.ebay.com/itm/166082555920

CUPS seems to support it (available as a docker), but I know people have hit and miss luck with that... perhaps as a plan B you could setup a VM and get the OS to share out the printer.

Yes you need to use macvlan if you want unique mac address per container, otherwise they will share the nic's mac (ipvlan setting). The caveat being macvlan historically has caused some instability in some systems, although that seems to be largely fixed in 6.12+

Asked for the same thing (and a little more) 3 years ago, and still think its a good idea