isvein

Everything is taken from the podcast that everyone should watch I also think this is a nice way to tell about future things and "roadmap" I think people would be happy with an "oh, for this version we plan this, for this version we plan this, but we cant set a date and time for it"

There wont be one, at least not one with dates on it and as someone else said ether in this thread or another just recently, with good reason. If there was a time-frame for stuff, people would complain just as much if the dates was not correct. But here is what we know so far at least: 6.13 -ZFS part2 -Will be the last version of Unraid 6 7.x -ZFS expand zpool -Multiply Unraid-Arrays -Everything will be a pool, multiply unraid-pools, zfs-pools, btrfs-pools -Mover updated so you can use mover from pool to pool -Requirement for Unraid-array to start, lifted -VM Snapshot and VM cloning -WebGUI seach, with multilingual support -IntelARC support Future ideas: -Hardware database: will my hardware work with Unraid? Database with users config, if they work or what you need to do for it to work. Users can choose to upload their setup anonymously -My Friends Network: expanding of UnraidConnect. Backup files encrypted/unencrypted to other Unraid servers -Responsive webgui -UnraidAPI

So when I started with unraid version 6 was rather new, version 5 was still supported and had its own forum section. Lately I been wondering; how was version 1 to 4? Can't seem to find any info on it. Sometime i wish there was like an unraid history page 😁

Memories is good, very good, but my problem lately is Nextcloud itself 😞 When trying to sync a lot of files/images at once, it freaks out with network errors, no matter if I tried with or without reverse proxy and tried to edit the config files to allow bigger files. So now Im trying out immich for images and Seafile for documents and so far its been faster and less errors than Nextcloud 👍

Now its not confusing 😁 thanks!

Agree, its confusing how it is written now. Also, its great to have options. Its a good thing that we both have the unraid-array, btrfs, xfs and zfs options. And without the array, unraid would not be unraid, just another TrueNAS "clone" that would sit between core and scale. As I try to tell all the TrueNAS "sellers" out there, TrueNAS is great, but me and many does not like or want that we are locked to zfs. And surprise surprise, the hard hitting TrueNAS "sellers" wont mention up front that its locked to zfs, basically need identical drives, cant (for now) expand an pool without putting in same amount as drives as existing vdev(s), cant use mixed size drives (unless you make multiply pools). And if you try to point this out they most of the time just goes "Buuut muuuh freee!!" (also TrueNAS is not truly free, they too have developers they need to pay just like Lime, but since TrueNAS is an (as far as I know) hard hitter in the enterprise market. they also sell their own hardware solutions, there is where they get the money from. If Unraid had been a hard hitter in enterprise marked, Lime had sold their own hardware solutions etc, Im pretty sure Unraid would have been free for private use too.)

Just to put things into perspective, the new lifetime licence of 250USD = 1x8TB HDD here in Norway

I must say that the new update box, getting the updates notes and known issues before updating (or needing to check them here) is an nice touch!

And now the question about security updates is answered too

Gonna put this out there again: I dont get why LT dont have an patreon or something similar (found the merch shop tho) so they who want can throw money at LT just as we can throw money directly at the plugin/container devs and people likle SI1/Ed

The PS-Photograpy plan is not a bad deal for home-users. Before when PS was per version payment, I could not afford PS at all, after I could. When I used primary Mac I used Aperture until Apple killed that, then stand alone Lightroom because it was affordable before the Photography plan made PS way more accessible for us who could not spend that much money at once.

Hello How is the file for the "Ignore files listed inside of a text file" function supposed to be formatted and can it be used to ignore complete folders too?

Even Topaz, who basically had the EXACT same model (beside they screwed us customers over by releasing an new version where our old licence was not valid) does NOT call it an "subscription" (because it is not) https://www.topazlabs.com/pricing Also: Also this is like this skit:

Don`t come and say I did not warn ya!

Would it be possible to have an option for shutting down all docker containers while parity check is running and start them up when done?