kanth

Must have been the cable, have done reboots and it has come up at 10/1000 now. Solved.

Yes, everything is gigabit. I just manually set the card: ethtool -s eth0 speed 1000 duplex full I will replace the cable (which should be a cat5e). It didn't occur to me that the autonegotiate might drop it on a bad cable. I just don't want to have to manually set it every boot, although it's easy enough to do so in the boot script. I'll start down that road.

Unraid: 6.6.7 Hi all, just noticed this when I added the speedtest app to my Unraid. The board in this is a Supermicro - C2SE, it used to be lime-tech's de-facto board to use, shipped in their own physical product. That board has on it a 10/100/1000 network card. Unraid sees it on boot, and in lspci on Unraid it shows as this: 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02) However, when I look at it in Unraid, using the Info button it shows this: Network: eth0: 100 Mb/s, full duplex, mtu 1500 I have done network speedtests, via the plugin and it is consistently below 100 mbps. My connection is actually like 500mbps, and I've tested the computer next to it and receive that speed. I figure if Unraid SHOWS it as 10/100, then it must be configuring it this way or something.. Anyone have any idea what I can do to get the full speed out of my connection?

Right, back when they introduced cache drives, it was simply /mnt/cache. Mover got introduced afterwards (shortly). Dockers could only run on the cache drive. So most of my files are simply on /mnt/cache, not on a "share" that was made for them. It's all good. I can either add a share and change all the pathing, or disable the script like I have done forever... and was previously the recommended solution. Neither is a big deal.

Again, that seems really difficult compared to just adding "disabled" to the drop down menu. I mean what is cleaner than that? Perhaps it is the way you like to think about it. For me putting in exit 0, seemed easy in the script. Yes there are ways to work around it. But asking mover.sh not to run, period, doesn't seem to me like some trying/or difficult piece of code. if [ $OPTION = disabled ]; then exit 0; *shrug*

It seems really odd to me that the scheduler allows one to schedule parity checks, or disable doing them. But doesn't allow one to _disable_ mover. I use my cache drive to hold various things on it that I _never_ want "moved" onto the unraid array. Currently the way I stop unraid from doing a mover function is to copy a script over top of the mover script that just has an exit 0 in it. It would be much better to be able to disable this functionality if the user wishes. (And simple!)

Nope! Tried that and it fixed it! Thanks!

Sparkly, I'm having issues since the update of unraid to 6.2 and the Krusader update. Krusader worked for years for me, but I updated unraid and your docker when the new releases came out. When I start the docker, it goes to connecting to Guacamole, and brings up the Session: Krusader login. But when I hit OK... nothing happens. Seems like it gets a bad display var from the logs. And searching also seems like it may be a fairly common problem: (https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=47912.0) Any suggestions?

Thanks, I saw the MC edit, but I've never been terribly fond of that. I installed Krusader, it is exactly what I wanted. This is way, way faster than what I was doing already. I am ecstatically pleased.Thank you so much.

Krusader seems like it would be spot on for what I want to do. I will try out this solution. Thanks!

I'm on unRaid 6.0, in case that seems useful to know what is on the system. This is kind of weird, well it doesn't seem so to me but it is in general. I have a linux machine, in the house that is permanently on a VPN connection and runs my bittorrent services. The download drive where that puts the data from the torrent files is the cache drive, of my unRaid tower. (So in short, that linux box samba mounts the cache drive from unRaid). I have the automatic moving of stuff on the cache drive into the array turned off, because I like to sort it myself. So when "stuff" is downloaded. I would in general like to be able to open a gui to the unRaid machine, and then drag the files in /mnt/cache/bitorrent/data to /mnt/user/anime/<whatever anime series>/ via a GUI. Right now I log in, and cp or mv the files in UNIX. And hey, that works. But it seems more time consuming and cumbersome to type esoteric names in the quotes than it should be. Now I have tried just opening both as shares, from windows, and dragging a file from one share to another.. but of course this means the file transfers off unRaid's cache share to my Windows PC, then it transfers it back onto the unRaid array and into the user share. Really inefficient.. and ultimately stupid. I was looking to see if unRaid had vncserver on it, then I could just open to it, and use the file manager in it to transfer the files between the native filesystems, but it doesn't seem built into it. And it makes sense that unRaid probably doesn't have all the x windows requirements to run it.. (nor a file manager for X) so one would need a complicated docker. How do other people deal with this? I'm really handy in UNIX.. but it doesn't seem like that helps. I could probably write an esoteric script to categorize stuff, easier, to make less movement required. But it doesn't seem to me that what I want to do should be.. so.. unsupported, natively. So I wanted to ask the question before going down that route. Any advice?

I'm not positive what you mean. You take this script and put it into a file, make it executable (chmod 755 <scriptname>), and call it from the "go" file. Example: /boot/custom/execute_customization.sh Your /etc/inetd.conf file has these lines in it (not next to each other) ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd vsftpd telnet stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd in.telnetd That script there. If executed puts the # symbol into inetd which "comments out" the lines of code in there that "turn on telnet." (I actually put 3 of them there so we can tell it is this script that did it). The last part of it, find's the Process ID of inetd, and sends a kill -HUP to it.. which is a "restart and reread your configuration" request. So it re-reads the configuration file, sees that we want telnet/ftp is turned off, and stops listening to those requests. I can send further instructions if the above has not helped. -Kanth

Excellent. This is actually 4.7, but will be 5 in a short time. I can move it to that level before swapping positions around.

I think I know how this works, but want to be confirm before I unplug my drives and put them in my case attached at different locations. I have an unraid server with 7 drives in it. Those 7 drives are in Icydock 4:3 SATA cases. The 1st dock is attached with 4 SATA connections going from the Dock to the Motherboard, which is the StarMicro board Unraid recommended for servers at the time. This holds my parity drive and 3 other data drives. The 2nd dock is attached with 4 sata connections to a AOC-SASLP-MV8 card. It has 3 data drives in it. So within unraid my first 4 devices (parity, disk1, disk2, disk3,) looks like normal scsi devices on a scsi chain. For instance: pci-0000:00:1f.2-scsi-3:0:0:0 host6 (sdh) The devices attached to the AOC card, look like a different kind of device, because of the attachment point. pci-0000:01:00.0-sas-phy1:1-0x0100000000000000:1 My understanding, is that if I detach, the SATA cables on those first 4 devices and attach them to my AOC card's second port. All 4 of those devices would go missing. However, they would be found if I go to my disk devices, and as long as I assigned the correct disks to the right "disk" location, the array would come back online. In fact, I would presume, that is how you move devices from one machine to another, if a motherboard blew up, or some oher catastrophe. All Unraid cares about is that the disk that Unraid calls "disk2" is replaced in position "disk2" to start the array. It doesn't care where it is attached to in the box, whether it is on a SAS port, sata port, or even is a lun from a SAN, as long as the image is in the proper "disk" slot set up for the array. Is this understanding correct? Because I would like to move these drives off the motherboard SATA ports and onto the second port of my AOC card. Then remap them to their correct disk locations.

Hiya. I removed any add ons (commented out of my go script) and backed up my flash drive. Upon following the instructions for upgrading from 4.7 to 5.0.x when the box came back up one of the disks displays a red dot. parity 30°C 2 TB - - - - *disk1 Wrong WL80GSA872 _WOL240022754 30°C 80 GB80 GB - - - - disk2 28°C 1 TB - - - - disk3 28°C 2 TB - - - - disk4 29°C 2 TB - - - - disk5 31°C 2 TB - - - - disk6 32°C 2 TB - - - - Down at the bottom it says *Upgrading Disk* However, that is the same disk.. ID and all.. that was in that slot before. From 4.7: parity device:pci-0000:00:1f.2-scsi-3:0:0:0 host5 (sdh) WDC_WD20EARS-00MVWB0_WD-WMAZA2012130 disk1 device:pci-0000:00:1f.2-scsi-0:0:0:0 host2 (sde) WL80GSA872_WOL240022754 disk2 device:pci-0000:00:1f.2-scsi-1:0:0:0 host3 (sdf) WDC_WD10EACS-00C7B0_WD-WCASJ1880780 <extra data removed> Not certain what to do from here. Please advise. -Kanth PS: I have reverted back to 4.7 at this time, until advised on how to move forward. 4.7 is fine and stable.