amatt

Zoho perhaps? We use them for our small business email accounts. Totally free at our use level of three accounts using our domain. Took a bit to configure initially - GoDaddy for the Domain registration, Shopify for hosting and Zoho for mail.

I suspect nothing... I'm seeing the same thing Bro. Look in the smart area of your drives and notice the hours - mine are all about the same. This is a new set-up with three new drives + parity. I moved ~ 15 TB of data and all seems fine, Every time I check on the machine with the web gui , disk one appears to be awake. When I check each drives' history, their spun-up hours are within 50 hours.

Hey Brucey7, Sounds like a ton of work - our collection is 1/10 of yours and it took months to convert and catalogue. I was curious what front end you use to present your media from your servers for such a large collection? We still use YAMJ with some scripting help for proper html pointers, but at ~ 3000 movies, full scans take about an hour to run. Rarity search - HBO Original movie "Long Gone" with Virginia Madson and William Peterson - baseball movie.

Thanks, bid placed...

The share (folders) exist on all drives (2000+ titles). Something in 5.0 appears to be ignoring the remaining array to publish to disk 5. After filling it again, the next largest, disk 12 was used correctly. I even excluded disk 5 from all shares before attempting to store more data last night - also ignored. I have three unraid servers and several years of maintenance without issue. No issues with rc16 were noted. Thanks

No Joy - moved about 80GB of data to the "Movies" share from a W7 workstation last night. The data was on the cache drive as expected. When I woke this morning unRaid had ignored the exclusion of disk 5, filled it up again, then moved on to disk 12 which is in fact the largest empty space (see original post for screen shot comparison) Is the new version "seeing" disk 5 as larger than it is and ignoring exclusions? WTF Thanks!

will do, thanks

No worries, thanks for your attention! I suppose I could set a threshold for the drive and see if that takes it out of the loop. Thought I'd ask the community before hosing something.

Sorry, no, I did not. I can share (samba) any drive and write directly to it - no issue. In fact, I removed ~ 300GB to a local drive then wrote it to disk 12. As you see, disk 5 is again the preferred target. Thanks! Albert

DOS spoken here... Is this what you requested?

LASTLY...

Thanks for looking

All are the same - attachments will follow. Thanks

I seem to have an issue since moving to 5.0 where mover is choosing one drive to fill instead of spreading the load. I can share dirves and write directly to the array, but mover has always worked correctly in the past. Any thoughts? Look at disk "5"; share level is at "2" as it has always been... Got some big drives ready and waiting. Thanks in advance.

Hey Johnm, I found that dcp2 and I both live in DFW - he was kind enough to share the machine with me for a song. Thanks for writing about your experiences with Atlas. I'll be along soon...